This journal article examines enhanced decentralization, federalism, and secession as alternative post-conflict governance models for Yemen and assesses their implications for stability and state-building. The study investigates what governance arrangements best align with Yemen’s political, social, and economic context; how institutional legitimacy and local autonomy can be balanced in a fragile, divided state; and what lessons can be drawn from other countries with similar experiences. A hybrid approach—balancing regional autonomy with national cohesion and institutional reform—is identified as the most promising model.
Other resources you may be interested in:
Accountability mechanisms in Yemen: Insights from Taiz, Aden, Hadhramawt, and Al Mahra
Analysis of the de jure and de facto state of accountability in Yemen, with case studies on accountability mechanisms in the four governorates of Taiz, Aden, Hadhramawt and Al Mahra.
Strengthening Institutional and Economic Resilience in Yemen (SIERY) – Final Evaluation Report.
This final project evaluation assesses the UNDP SIERY project’s performance from 2020–2025 in strengthening local governance, public service delivery, and economic resilience across nine governorates in Yemen. Given this project has been the largest project in terms of funding volume and geographical coverage supporting local governance in Yemen, it offers interesting insights in the opportunities […]
Pathways for Reconciliation – Impact of the Conflict on Social Cohesion and Reconciliation in Yemen
This report presents findings from consultations across seven Yemeni governorates on how conflict has affected social cohesion and reconciliation, and offers community-based recommendations for peacebuilding and local resilience. It inclues a discussion of trust within communities and with local authorities, providing a district-level breakdown of perceptions.
